From Analog to Digital Photography

I bought my first camera in 1984. I had just finished a degree (German Diplom) in Geology when I realized that my true passion was traveling and photographing. So I turned it into my job.
I started with a full manual camera, a Nikon FM2. No program, neither aperture or shutter priority and of course no autofocus, and I had to wind the film manually! Needless to say digital photography was not even dreamed of at that time. You had a roll of 36 images either negative film or slide film inside the body. And all of you who started right away with digital photography have no idea how careful one had to be not running out of film while shooting a wildlife action scene. You had to make a split second decision exactly when to press the shutter button. But not only this, you also were forced to capture the scene at the perfect moment, in perfect light with a perfect composition and FILLING the frame. Cropping a 35mm film was totally out of question for the photo agencies I worked for. And it was a real bummer if you had forgotten to adjust the exposure which I had to do manually as I mentioned above. 
In my early 90’s I bought my first autofocus and automatic metering camera. Wow, what a change! I was first very suspicious about the AF. Did it really work? It did! Together with the amazing programs you now could get action shots that were almost impossible to achieve before. Birds flying towards you, cheetahs hunting, rhinos charging me (this actually happened) – all in perfect focus. AF and auto programs opened another world in wildlife and sports photography. So did the fast motor winders that allowed you to burn a 36 frame slide film roll in a bit over 3 seconds! You better had spare camera bodies loaded with film next to you!
 How has the photography world changed since then!
African elephants at water hole in Savuti, Chobe National Park, Botswana

Image taken on Velvia 50 slide film, manual focus

 I sometimes ask myself this question: Is digital photography still the same art form as analog photography? I remember a scene in Ranthambhore National Park in India a few years ago that make me doubt this. Behind me in another game drive vehicle was a fully camouflaged “photographer” with a fully camouflaged long lens. We were watching a tigress and her 3 cubs cooling off in a waterhole. Even when the tigers didn’t move at all the guy behind me had his camera rattling like an AK-47 machine gun during combat in WWII. Within minutes he must have filled his flash card with far over a 1000 files. Needles to say this rattling is very annoying to other people, especially to me. I hate human generated noise in nature. So why did he do this? Overblown ego? Showing off his new camera with an amazing burst rate of 12 files/sec? Has he thought about editing later? This kind of so-called photography rather reminds of filming with a video camera and has nothing in common with the traditional art of photography. 
Then comes the topic of cropping. During one of my photo workshops I mentioned that I hardly crop or if so just a bit. Sure, these huge files can handle quite a bit of cropping. But I still prefer to frame the images in a way which makes cropping unnecessary.
When I mentioned the 1/3 composition rule, one of the students responded that he always used his center focus bracket and then later cropped the image so much that he was able to position his subject in one of the corners. I just shook my head.
Snowy owl

Image taken with digital camera and autofocus tracking

To take digital photography even further: Every time I look at Instagram my stomach revolts. Do you have any idea how many images have been digitally manipulated to such an extent that the result has nothing in common any more with realty. The sad news is that the inexperienced viewer falls in awe over something that photoshop has created. I have nothing against digital art when it is declared as such. We have to strictly separate these two forms of image creations.
I greatly enjoy the new age of digital photography. It has made my life easier over the years in many regards. However I am still trying to work as I did at the beginning by filling the frame, only clicking the shutter button when it is worth clicking and perfectly composing the image already for the first frame. But I don’t have to send original slides for duping to labs anymore, the image quality is so much better and the resolution is mind-blowing. Not to forget the flexibility to change the ISO setting and the fantastic qualility at high ISO. – Last I don’t run out of film anymore after only 36 frames!
Theo Allofs
Please also read the related blog about the misuse of the term Fine Art Photography
0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply